Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • D djangoldp-account
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 20
    • Issues 20
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 1
    • Merge requests 1
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Container Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • djangoldp-packages
  • djangoldp-account
  • Issues
  • #72

Closed
Open
Created Mar 01, 2021 by Calum Mackervoy@calummackervoyMaintainer

DjangoLDP-Account: Database-backed Solid-POD provider?

At the moment this package provides authentication for the Resource Server side of Solid-OIDC (#70 (closed) ) (i.e. for the server application to which the client is connecting), and it provides a federated user model (LDPUser) which is decisively not a Solid Pod

I assume that this isn't a short-term objective but worth investigating the possibility of providing a Solid Pod with DjangoLDP-Account or a new package, and what changes would need to be made to DjangoLDP

If we did go down this track, I think it'd be very challenging to efficiently model the kind of "infinite variety of fields" (the Open World Assumption) which a triplestore offers, but incredibly useful for standards compliance in DjangoLDP in general if we did provide this. I did a little investigating into Apache Jena's SQL-backed SDB, but they've discontinued this effort. It would be interesting to find out what they were doing and why they discontinued it

They provide a Triplestore-backed database system which is largely discussed as being fast, but I haven't seen any benchmark comparisons. Being able to separate the datasets into separate files is quite nice. Extending Django with a new Triplestore Database provider is possible, and it wouldn't necessarily mean that users can't use SQL-backed databases as well or instead

If we were successful in this effort it would provide a serious performance improvement over conventional filesystem-backed Pods (https://forum.solidproject.org/t/constructive-criticism-from-an-experienced-developer/3521)

Edited Mar 02, 2021 by Calum Mackervoy
Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking