@jbpasquier I finally add it on djangoldp, so no reason to put it in sib-manager
@sylvain Less flexibility. Now if you want to put /users/ in myserver/my_specific_path/users, you can't. Route are defined in modules and only in modules. So if 2 modules define the same route, developers are unable to fix it without merge-requesting the module
By Jean-Baptiste on 2019-04-16T08:34:30 (imported from GitLab project)
My opinion is that users who want more flexibility can just remove djangoldp.urls and define their owns. They're not our main target.
Now the situation today is that users building a Sib app have an error because of User not having a url. They have to add a urls.py file just for User. And they're all in this situation. I think it's not really developer friendly.
@bleme have you seen this comment? What do you think?
The situation today is that users building a Sib app have an error because of User not having a url. They have to add a urls.py file just for User. And they're all in this situation. I think it's not really developer friendly.